Posts: 69269
Threads: 140
Joined: June 28, 2011
Reputation:
161
RE: Gay rights within the template of religion proves flaws in "religion"
October 16, 2014 at 1:46 pm
(October 16, 2014 at 11:29 am)CristW Wrote: <--- Your Logic. Look amigo, I'm only asking you to do the groundwork here because no matter how hard I try...I can't seem to choose my sexual orientation. I figure, since you seem to think it has something to do with choice...that you must be able to do so. I'd be shocked, schocked I say...if it turns out that you're speaking directly out of your ass.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Posts: 31905
Threads: 205
Joined: July 19, 2011
Reputation:
141
RE: Gay rights within the template of religion proves flaws in "religion"
October 16, 2014 at 4:24 pm
(October 15, 2014 at 12:38 pm)C4RM5 Wrote: First of all Matthew did meet Jesus he was one of his apostles.
You will, of course, have no problem demonstrating that the Gospel according to Matthew was in fact written by the apostle Matthew.
The fact of the matter is that, contrary to what the church teaches as tradition, we have no idea who wrote any of the four gospels.
Posts: 7045
Threads: 20
Joined: June 17, 2014
Reputation:
55
RE: Gay rights within the template of religion proves flaws in "religion"
October 16, 2014 at 4:26 pm
(October 16, 2014 at 4:24 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: (October 15, 2014 at 12:38 pm)C4RM5 Wrote: First of all Matthew did meet Jesus he was one of his apostles.
You will, of course, have no problem demonstrating that the Gospel according to Matthew was in fact written by the apostle Matthew.
The fact of the matter is that, contrary to what the church teaches as tradition, we have no idea who wrote any of the four gospels.
Get yer logic and facts outta here..
In every country and every age, the priest had been hostile to Liberty.
- Thomas Jefferson
Posts: 433
Threads: 2
Joined: July 20, 2012
Reputation:
5
RE: Gay rights within the template of religion proves flaws in "religion"
October 16, 2014 at 6:30 pm
(October 16, 2014 at 11:29 am)CristW Wrote: Your formula?...
Attracted to men + Attracted to women = Bi-sexual
Yup.
(October 16, 2014 at 11:29 am)CristW Wrote: Attracted to men + Sexual intercourse with women = (Heterosexual)?
Nope. That's your retarded logic.
(October 16, 2014 at 11:29 am)CristW Wrote: Attracted to men + Sexual intercourse with men = Homosexual
Yes.
(October 16, 2014 at 11:29 am)CristW Wrote: Sexual intercourse with men + Sexual intercourse with women = Bi-sexual.
Again, your logic.
(October 16, 2014 at 11:29 am)CristW Wrote: Sexual intercourse with men + Attracted to women = (Homosexual)?
See above.
(October 16, 2014 at 11:29 am)CristW Wrote: Attracted to women + Sexual intercourse with women = Heterosexual
Yes.
(October 16, 2014 at 11:29 am)CristW Wrote: *Given that it is a Male(Man)* Note: I am the last category.
The only people I know of who need to constantly assert to others that they're heterosexual are not, in fact, heterosexual. I can help with that, if you know what I mean.
(October 16, 2014 at 11:29 am)CristW Wrote: Now, I want you to explain the ones with the question mark and elaborate?
I've already elaborated plenty, but I'll try.
What you do doesn't define what you like. People do things they don't like all the time; it's a part of life. By your logic, kids who eat broccoli actually like to eat it, and kids who do their homework like to do homework. Adults who work double-shifts to keep the power on at home like to work themselves half to death, and adults who flip burgers for a living like to be in a practically dead-end job.
See the problem?
(October 16, 2014 at 11:29 am)CristW Wrote: Point: No matter what is the sexual orientation, the (final) act is still the factor in figuring out sexual orientation.
I see no point.
The truth is absolute. Life forms are specks of specks (...) of specks of dust in the universe.
Why settle for normal, when you can be so much more? Why settle for something, when you can have everything?
Posts: 10
Threads: 0
Joined: October 16, 2014
Reputation:
0
RE: Gay rights within the template of religion proves flaws in "religion"
October 16, 2014 at 6:56 pm
Well, seeing that all religions are primitive and barbaric. their 'perfect' holy books are unable to evolve with the times, meaning that they are not perfect. I knew this one girl years ago, she is gay, and she would get sick when she tried to 'chose' to be straight. It is not a choice. they are born that way, there for 'god' made them that way. well thats my thoughts.
Posts: 8214
Threads: 394
Joined: November 2, 2011
Reputation:
44
RE: Gay rights within the template of religion proves flaws in "religion"
October 16, 2014 at 7:48 pm
The bible is a lot harder to justify then the Quran from what it seems. All the Quran has written is the story of a city that who's men were engaged in sex with other men and they were condemned for doing something no nation before them had done. This could be easily said to not be that homosexuality was prohibited but that a society which is most composed of heterosexuals should not be engaged in these acts. It was said in hadiths that there was a trial, that God made the women ugly, as a test for the city. This is why despite being heterosexual, they chose to have sex with men.
Aside from that, all the anti-gay stuff comes from the hadiths.
Posts: 159
Threads: 15
Joined: July 6, 2014
Reputation:
2
RE: Gay rights within the template of religion proves flaws in "religion"
October 16, 2014 at 9:06 pm
(This post was last modified: October 16, 2014 at 9:10 pm by CristW.)
Posts: 28389
Threads: 226
Joined: March 24, 2014
Reputation:
184
RE: Gay rights within the template of religion proves flaws in "religion"
October 17, 2014 at 7:37 pm
(This post was last modified: October 17, 2014 at 9:07 pm by Losty.)
I don't even know what it means to have or not have a right to be gay. Should people who are gay have rights? Yes, they're people and they should have the same rights as everyone else. But how do you have or not have a right to be gay? I don't get it.
Do Mexicans have a right to be Mexican?
Do gingers have a right to have green eyes?
Whether or not you think they have a right to be Mexican, or gay, or have green eyes they will still be that way because they just are. It's not something they can change, it's not something we can make them change, they don't have a choice. If you're gay you just are regardless of how other people feel about it. Even regardless of how you feel about it.
(August 21, 2017 at 11:31 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: "I'm not a troll"
Religious Views: He gay
0/10
Hammy Wrote:and we also have a sheep on our bed underneath as well
Posts: 7045
Threads: 20
Joined: June 17, 2014
Reputation:
55
RE: Gay rights within the template of religion proves flaws in "religion"
October 17, 2014 at 8:01 pm
CristW, copying theists' tactics of Insulting our intelligence when he doesnt agree.
In every country and every age, the priest had been hostile to Liberty.
- Thomas Jefferson
Posts: 34
Threads: 1
Joined: August 13, 2014
Reputation:
0
RE: Gay rights within the template of religion proves flaws in "religion"
October 17, 2014 at 10:44 pm
(This post was last modified: October 17, 2014 at 10:46 pm by jughead.)
I don't understand the poll. I didn't vote.
Queers have a right to be queer. Being queer goes against nature, it is not healthy and normal behavior for the most part. I don't believe in homosexual marriage. But I think committed homosexuals should be given the right that married couples get.
That is my opinion on queers.
Religion?
It is all man-made gibberish. As such they make up the rules as they go. If they don't become homosexual loving in nature, too much $ will leave their coffers. They must adapt and embrace homosexuals or die.
|