Quote:every kid should obey their Father till they are married.
Some fathers are assholes, drippy. Yours must be a pip.
Women's Position In Religion
|
Quote:every kid should obey their Father till they are married. Some fathers are assholes, drippy. Yours must be a pip. RE: Women's Position In Religion
January 11, 2015 at 9:47 pm
(This post was last modified: January 11, 2015 at 9:50 pm by JuliaL.)
(January 11, 2015 at 9:12 pm)Drich Wrote: there is nothing unfair here we have different roles. Is it unfair that women are the ones made to bare children? We just have different jobs.In my family both husband and wife bare children, generally around bath time and before they put their PJs on.
So how, exactly, does God know that She's NOT a brain in a vat?
(January 11, 2015 at 9:24 pm)Spooky Wrote: 1st Corinthians 14:34 What the problem is? If you read that passage in context it regulates what everyone can say and when. RE: Women's Position In Religion
January 11, 2015 at 10:17 pm
(This post was last modified: January 11, 2015 at 10:23 pm by Spooky.)
(January 11, 2015 at 10:08 pm)Drich Wrote:(January 11, 2015 at 9:24 pm)Spooky Wrote: 1st Corinthians 14:34 Yep, sure does. Edit: Know what? I've got a minute, let's talk about your context. John 3:16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. Let's take that verse in the context of the entire bible: Plagues Flood Murder Orders to murder Sexism Slavery Racism Etc. God doesn't seem to love the world much. Or, if that's what the bible calls love, I'd not like to see hate.
I reject your reality and substitute my own!
(January 11, 2015 at 10:17 pm)Spooky Wrote:(January 11, 2015 at 10:08 pm)Drich Wrote: What the problem is? Dirch wouldn't last 5 minutes as a woman in the old days of Christianity.
Atheism is a non-prophet organization join today.
Code: <iframe width="100%" height="450" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/255506953&auto_play=false&hide_related=false&show_comments=true&show_user=true&show_reposts=false&visual=true"></iframe> (January 11, 2015 at 10:17 pm)Spooky Wrote:(January 11, 2015 at 10:08 pm)Drich Wrote: What the problem is? Ooo. What fun! I love these types of challenges. I have done this one before so forgive me if I re use some of the info I used before. It's all still revelent. So let's look at John 3:16 (even though it has absolutly nothing to do with the topic at hand and should probably be its own thread out of courtesy for the OP) John 3:16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. Now first thing we need to look at is what is actually said. From your rant I take it that you believe that this passage speaks to an Omni benevolence of God. Meaning a God who loves without condition, and without limitation. If this were the case then the passage itself would be in conflict. Because it says 'God loved the world/people in the world so much that His gift to us was to sacrifice His only Son for the redemption of sin On the condition we believe in His Son and what He taught. Now also understand the word for love here is the greek word Agape. There are four expressions/words for love in the greek that repersent four totally seperate aspects/concepts of the one word in English we understand as simply 'love.' To boil the word of philosophy of love down to its simplist form in today's popular culture it means that the love giver always wants the easiest, and best for the receiver of love. Despite what the easy and best could mean in the future. In the Greek this form of love is known as philia. Philia is the type of good will or well wishing one may have for a brother or friend. God's love for us in John 3:16 is not Philia. It is Agape. Agape is generally expressed from a point of charity or help. This type of love needs no response. It is an offering, or way to help. In John 3:16 God's offering ends with His Son's death. Any benfit after what has been initially offered is conditional, and contingent on one accepting His invitation. So clearly God's love has limits, and is not meant for everyone to benefit from.
Men and women are physically different, therefor men can tell women what to do? Cool.
I wonder how many women God "inspired" to write parts of the bible. Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists. Index of useful threads and discussions Index of my best videos Quickstart guide to the forum (January 12, 2015 at 12:53 am)robvalue Wrote: Men and women are physically different, therefor men can tell women what to do? Cool. None because they weren't allowed to.
Atheism is a non-prophet organization join today.
Code: <iframe width="100%" height="450" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/255506953&auto_play=false&hide_related=false&show_comments=true&show_user=true&show_reposts=false&visual=true"></iframe> Quote:every kid should obey their Father till they are married. I meant into adulthood. Some forms of Christian Reconstructionism teach that daughters should stay at home until they marry and obey their fathers even if the daughters are well into adulthood. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_R...ructionism http://www.apologeticsindex.org/r10.html
Once they move out, then parental control evaporates.
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|