BLM Violent Hate Group

[paulpablo]

[GrandizerII]

Yeah, no one should ever quote infowars.com if they want to be taken seriously. As for the links you posted, I checked the second and third links and have no idea where you want me to look. Regarding the first link, it's a file that contains stats on homicides committed against and by various demographic groups. Ok, so how is this relevant exactly to the topic of this thread?

I don't want you to look anywhere. I have no idea what relevance it has to the thread. It's just you were saying info wars is unreliable I was saying I would usually agree with you because they tend to talk about chemtrails and things like that, but in this instance they seem to have provided sources for the claims they're making.

Uh, no, if you noticed, they (infowars.com) provided their own interpretations which aren't logically deduced from the sources they referenced.

For example, this:

Black people in the United States are more likely to be victims of violent confrontations with police officers than whites because they commit more violent crimes than whites per capita.

Where in the stats provided is this causal claim shown to be true?

[paulpablo]

I don't want you to look anywhere. I have no idea what relevance it has to the thread. It's just you were saying info wars is unreliable I was saying I would usually agree with you because they tend to talk about chemtrails and things like that, but in this instance they seem to have provided sources for the claims they're making.

Uh, no, if you noticed, they (infowars.com) provided their own interpretations which aren't logically deduced from the sources they referenced.

For example, this:

Black people in the United States are more likely to be victims of violent confrontations with police officers than whites because they commit more violent crimes than whites per capita.

Where in the stats provided is this causal claim shown to be true?

True that part can't be proven.

[GrandizerII]

Uh, no, if you noticed, they (infowars.com) provided their own interpretations which aren't logically deduced from the sources they referenced.

For example, this:




Where in the stats provided is this causal claim shown to be true?

True that part can't be proven.

But it can potentially be demonstrated to be true with studies showing this to be the case. It's not proof that's desired here anyway, but rather adequate empirical evidence.

Problem is that infowars.com provided some hypotheses without giving them a test.

[A Theist]

True that part can't be proven.

Problem is that infowars.com provided some hypotheses without giving them a test.

The same way I feel about Sears and Henry. Both are leftist hacks. In their so-called symbolic racism scale they look to have created it on the premise that whites are the oppressors and blacks are the oppressed. These guys are scam artists. Just curious about your opinion. Can blacks be racist?

[GrandizerII]

Problem is that infowars.com provided some hypotheses without giving them a test.

The same way I feel about Sears and Henry. Both are leftist hacks. In their so-called symbolic racism scale they  look to have created it on the premise that whites are the oppressors and blacks are the oppressed. These guys are scam artists. Just curious about your opinion. Can blacks be racist?

How you feel is no determinant of what is true. Unlike infowars.com, researchers usually test their hypotheses, and hence why we have a number of studies on modern racism.

Yeah, black people can be racist, particularly against other black people. But why ask anyway? Did you just want to feel better about yourself by being told by a leftist bastard like me that black people can be racist?

[abaris]

Where in the stats provided is this causal claim shown to be true?

Which is also a totally untrue statement, so no need to even ask. According to official statistics. Blacks and Whites commit crimes at roughly the same rate (Which by the way I won't look up for the ones talking out of their asses here. They can very well do their own homework). So, go figure, if there's a little bit of an agenda, apart from Infowar being the tinfoil or tinfoils when it comes to news.

[paulpablo]

[account_inactive]

The same way I feel about Sears and Henry. Both are leftist hacks. In their so-called symbolic racism scale they  look to have created it on the premise that whites are the oppressors and blacks are the oppressed. These guys are scam artists. Just curious about your opinion. Can blacks be racist?

How you feel is no determinant of what is true. Unlike infowars.com, researchers usually test their hypotheses, and hence why we have a number of studies on modern racism.

Yeah, black people can be racist, particularly against other black people. But why ask anyway? Did you just want to feel better about yourself by being told by a leftist bastard like me that black people can be racist?

Wait, what?

But why ask anyway?

Because there are morons out there who genuinely believe blacks can't be racist and he was making sure you weren't one of them. Is he not allowed to ask you fucking questions now?

[Regina]

Problem is that infowars.com provided some hypotheses without giving them a test.

The same way I feel about Sears and Henry. Both are leftist hacks. In their so-called symbolic racism scale they  look to have created it on the premise that whites are the oppressors and blacks are the oppressed. These guys are scam artists. Just curious about your opinion. Can blacks be racist?

Blacks can hold racist views, can maybe even act on them on a small scale. Any denial of that is utterly jejune.

However there's a big difference between that, and blacks holding unobstructed exclusive political, economic and media influence to swing everything in their own favour at the expense of white people. Sound familiar? It should. We've had 500 years of that, just with the roles reversed.