Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: October 31, 2026, 4:11 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Atheist Bible Study 1: Genesis
RE: Atheist Bible Study 1: Genesis
So we're back to 'copies of copies' corroborate the claims?


lol
Reply
RE: Atheist Bible Study 1: Genesis
There is no universally accepted non-Christian reference (statements by believers are not evidence) to an historical Jesus, (none) and many reasons to doubt his historicity. Comparing Caesar (who is a known secular human who is referenced in countless Roman civil documents, INCLUDING the works HE HIMSELF wrote, to a wandering preacher who is the object of faith, (never mentioned by Pontius Pilate, who Peter in Acts has to explain to the Jews who he was and what they did ... they didn't even know) is typical Christian dishonesty. The "passion" is made up. Never once in all of history, was the Sanhedrin called into session on Passover weekend.

There are no original documents of the NT.




Every religion is true one way or another. It is true when understood metaphorically. But when it gets stuck in its own metaphors, interpreting them as facts, then you are in trouble. - Joseph Campbell  Popcorn

Militant Atheist Commie Evolutionist 
Reply
RE: Atheist Bible Study 1: Genesis
Reply
RE: Atheist Bible Study 1: Genesis
(November 5, 2018 at 4:23 pm)Drich Wrote: bla bla bla

Whatever drugs you're on, dude, you should stop taking them.
AGAIN, put me on ignore. I have no plans to waste any time on your foolish rubbish.
You are an ignoramus. You have a 3rd Grade understanding of these matters.
Your garbage is not worth wasting even 1 second on.

Your conclusion about Pilate and Roman sources was so off the wall, it's just bizarre. I myself used a Roman source.
The distinction I made went over your head. You got nothing.
Nothing.
Every religion is true one way or another. It is true when understood metaphorically. But when it gets stuck in its own metaphors, interpreting them as facts, then you are in trouble. - Joseph Campbell  Popcorn

Militant Atheist Commie Evolutionist 
Reply
RE: Atheist Bible Study 1: Genesis
Moronic?

Actually, you DID say Court of Law, and you grew up in Florida, where I currently live. It would be absurd to to think you were talking about a court system from a completely different country.
You're claiming I used a straw man. Nonsense. I used your actual argument.
you claim a court ruled he deserved execution because he claimed to be the son of God, but there is no evidence that there ever was such a court ruling, so YOU are the one employing circular reasoning, relying on a court ruling that never happened to prove the thing happened because a court ruling condemned him. That is the definition of circular reasoning. It is far from "moronic." It is definitive.

You cannot prove there WAS a trial of Christ. Therefore, you cannot draw conclusions from that trial. Otherwise, your reasoning is circular.

Pilate did not point blank ask Jesus anything because Jesus likely never appealed before Pilate. The only evidence he did comes from sources that claim Pilate did things the real Pilate, according to reliable sources, never would have done. Like release a murderer because it was Passover. He never did that. Not only was it not his custom; it was antithetical to his vicious philosophy.

So if you want to claim the gospels as evidence the gospels happened, then I get to claim Amazing Fantasy 10 as evidence that Amazing Fantasy 10 happened, and therefore Spider-Man is real!

P.S.

No Spider-Man does NOT mean there is no New York, no Empire State Building, and no Twin Towers that were destroyed on 9/11.

It only means the fictional character who purportedly lived in NYC at the time those things existed... didn't.
Reply
RE: Atheist Bible Study 1: Genesis
Quote:first you claim I'm moving the goal posts, but I never assigned a ourt to judge Christ.

Your stupid fucking book did.
Reply
RE: Atheist Bible Study 1: Genesis
Reply
RE: Atheist Bible Study 1: Genesis
(November 5, 2018 at 4:23 pm)Drich Wrote: at least you are smart enough to know that not all light is generated from the sun. most of your peers can't fathom how light was created day one but the sun not till day 4... even if God didn't use a generator you still can understand how light can be made without the sun. good for you!

Where exactly is this other light generated?
Reply
RE: Atheist Bible Study 1: Genesis
God already had a mobile with a LED lantern. See how easy it is?
Reply
RE: Atheist Bible Study 1: Genesis
Reply



Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Genesis 1:26 is not implying God is triune GrandizerII 5 3025 August 12, 2025 at 9:40 pm
Last Post: GrandizerII
  Is this a contradiction or am I reading it wrong? Genesis 5:28 Ferrocyanide 110 44092 April 10, 2023 at 3:32 pm
Last Post: Ferrocyanide
  There are no answers in Genesis LinuxGal 248 71137 March 24, 2023 at 7:34 pm
Last Post: Ferrocyanide
  Without citing the bible, what marks the bible as the one book with God's message? Whateverist 143 75719 March 31, 2022 at 7:05 am
Last Post: Gwaithmir
  Evangelicals, Trump and a Quick Bible Study DeistPaladin 52 15993 November 9, 2020 at 3:20 pm
Last Post: downbeatplumb
  Bibe Study 2: Questionable Morality Rhondazvous 30 9242 May 27, 2019 at 12:23 pm
Last Post: Vicki Q
  Bible Study: The God who Lies and Deceives Rhondazvous 50 16657 May 24, 2019 at 5:52 pm
Last Post: Aegon
  Genesis interpretations - how many are there? Fake Messiah 129 45841 January 22, 2019 at 7:33 pm
Last Post: donlor
  Free interpretation of the Genesis 3:5 KJV theBorg 19 7656 November 13, 2016 at 2:03 am
Last Post: RiddledWithFear
  Genesis - The Prequel! Time Traveler 12 6232 May 17, 2016 at 1:16 am
Last Post: Love333



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)