(October 24, 2018 at 6:47 pm)Tizheruk Wrote:(October 24, 2018 at 2:23 pm)onlinebiker Wrote: It' s only clear if you know firsthand, who mailed them.1. No it not it's clear if there is reasonably high likelihood .First hand is not required
Any "knowing" you may have, clearly shows your bias - and your willingness to be led by the nose by a political party.
I will bet you anything you care to bet - that the Secret Service is looking at leftists and well as rightists.
I don' t know who did it - and real safe bet - neither do you.
2. Knowing as in reasonably assigning a likelihood. It has fuck all to do with parties no matter how much you insist it does
3.Just because they are looking at leftists does not mean they seriously believe they think it is one
4.I have a reasonable evidence based conclusion of who did it
So spare me your pretentious "i'm above this and your just partisan " nonsense .
I agree, it is self righteous nonsense.
This entire nonsense of "innocent until proven guilty" has nothing to do with the need to investigate and the other independent aspect of any investigation which is likelihood of behavior.
Just like any homicide investigator is going to look at whom the victim knew first not to presume guilt, but to play the odds of who did it to rule them in or out.
It isn't a matter of presuming guilt, but one could certainly rule out to a very high degree that a democrat in the inner circle of those targeted, or members of CNN staff did it.
So the only other options would be a hate group( (individual, or a group) on the right, or a foreign group whom has sympathy for the republican party.
But all of what you and the right say about this misses the bigger picture of the long term toxic rhetoric coming from the President which is dog whistle, bullhorn code for, "Take matters into your own hands", and "Violence is ok".
This is an asshole who said of Hillary, "2nd amendment solution"
Of reporters, "Enemy of the people and "fake news". And "body slam". And drug his feet on the reporter murdered by the Saudis.
Of protesters if you assault them, "I'll pay your legal bills", and "I'd like to knock the crap out of them"
I could give a fuck less about any right wing jackass trying to pull the fallacy of equivocation. Shit like this is going to happen when a leader talks in such a toxic manor.