The ethics of worship

[The Grand Nudger]

You have a moral standard?

Last I checked, I was stronger than a fetus, and if I want to crush it's skull, what can it do about that? Don't we satisfy the standard of might with respect to a fetus? Doesn't that make whatever we do good™ in the same way you've contended that it makes god good™?

[Sal]

There is nothing wrong with abortion, and most importantly there is nothing wrong with a woman's right to choose.

Abortion might be legal, but it doesn't follow that there is nothing wrong with it.

O rly?

How is something "wrong" with it, and what basis to you think that "wrong" is from? Play tell, sounds like a moral framework to me.

[The Architect Of Fate]

Abortion might be legal, but it doesn't follow that there is nothing wrong with it.

Abortion is morally justified even if it's desirable .

---

You have a moral standard?  

Last I checked, I was stronger than a fetus, and if I want to crush it's skull, what can it do about that?  Don't we satisfy the standard of might with respect to a fetus?  Doesn't that make whatever we do good™ in the same way you've contended that it makes god good™?

Or but good gets special consideration ......Because god

---

i have no problem with god killing women or children as we in this country do it to our own adversaries. the issue i have is you people are taking a narrative from the bible adding your own personal bits to the bible narrative and then charging god for the bits you added!!!

Are you saying that you evaluate the justness of God's actions on how well it accords with popular morality?

---

...
While it may not have a place in cannon it is no different and j[/font]
ust as viable as supporting literature as the books of maccabees (where the jews get hanukkah from and acts as a historical document that completes the time line between the book of isaiah and the book of matthew. enoch fills in from adam to noah.

The people who decided canon say otherwise.

---

none of you have killing women and children/babies if it is marketed correctly to you. substitute the word baby with fetus and that little bastard does not stand a chance. it will be dead faster than it takes for the ink to dry on the consent forms. ... 1.5 billion babies aborted since just 1980.. unless your saying you are against abortion and a woman's right to choose.

There are differences between babies and fetuses.  Whether or not those differences matter is debatable, but until you can demonstrate that those differences do not matter, then you cannot substitute babies with fetuses and have the same result.  You don't get to just ignore inconvenient facts.

Also ignores the fact that the fetus /baby distinction isn't even the important question .