Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 1, 2026, 3:31 pm
Thread Rating:
|
Speed-of-light experiments give baffling result at Cern
|
|
Zaki hasn't found this thread yet??
or doesn't understand it?Still waiting for news... I'm patient "The Universe is run by the complex interweaving of three elements: energy, matter, and enlightened self-interest." G'Kar-B5
RE: Speed-of-light experiments give baffling result at Cern
October 14, 2011 at 2:15 am
(This post was last modified: October 14, 2011 at 2:16 am by little_monkey.)
RE: Speed-of-light experiments give baffling result at Cern
October 14, 2011 at 3:04 am
(This post was last modified: October 14, 2011 at 4:19 am by Erinome.)
If the theory that neutrinos can travel faster than light had been proven, the scientific community would be overjoyed. Nothing science loves more than truth. It would have definitely changed physics, but unlike religion, science's responsibility is truth and not ancient, irrational claims.
As a chistian I know put it, after I explained to her cern's claims- "You never know, neutrinos could be angels... god's precious speckles." Instead scientific, skeptical minds collaborated, finding errors in the experiment/claims, and electromagnetic radiation (as far as we know) is still the fastest. I can understand that cern was excited to have their findings tested, so I don't find them untrustworthy for that. The anti-science factions will and do make up shit, science doesn't and won't. A mistake, at least, proves that someone did something. 42
The anti science factions will do that regardless, chuck. To me, it strenghtens my trust in it, It means they'll do and redo any calculations and won't fear coming with a correction.
Its still a long way from "LALALALALALA, I CAN'T HEAR YA, GODDIDIT, PERIOD!"
That is just how I see it. Unlike the religious factions who assail them using a text that was archaic a thousand years ago, scientists will say, "OK, so what did we learn here," and the quality of process will improve as a result of the questioning.
Trying to update my sig ...
Yes, it's always been a strength that science can self-correct. The problem I have here is the hype that was created even before the preliminary results were verified. I know it's has a lot to do with getting crucial funds for such huge undertaking. But the negative side is this sideshow can also undermine the process.
Religious shits would call it a "miracle," chalk it up to their stupid god and never dare to try to repeat the experiment.
I'll take science over those morons.
Me too Min, I'll take the persuit of fact and truth over defending a book of myths and lies anyday.
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)




or doesn't understand it?