(April 6, 2018 at 6:21 am)alpha male Wrote: Whatever consenting adults do blah blah blah...unless one's a Republican adviser, then it's just sick! 

I take it you didn't read the full article, since it explains the woman in question was not really in a position to consent (like railroading her into having sex with strange men while blindfolded; that's kind of difficult to reconcile with consent).

(April 6, 2018 at 9:28 am)Rev. Rye Wrote: I take it you didn't read the full article, since it explains the woman in question was not really in a position to consent (like railroading her into having sex with strange men while blindfolded; that's kind of difficult to reconcile with consent).

Er, the article says at that point she said no and broke up with him.

Quote:“He was very demanding and did not take no for an answer,” the woman—who was granted anonymity—told the Review-Journal. “Over the last month it escalated into very rough sex where he’d actually hurt me. He back-handed me… and forced himself on me.”

Quote:According to text messages obtained by the paper, Sparks demanded the woman “be bound and blindfolded and have sex with other men in front of him” on March 28—which the woman claims to have been her “breaking point.” The couple argued, and Sparks allegedly took off. When he returned home, allegedly under the “influence of drugs,” he reportedly continued fighting with her while trapping her in the house for two hours.

Quote:“He was very demanding and did not take no for an answer,” the woman—who was granted anonymity—told the Review-Journal. “Over the last month it escalated into very rough sex where he’d actually hurt me. He back-handed me… and forced himself on me.”

Quote:Ex-Fiancée: Nevada GOP Adviser Made Me His Sex Slave

FYI just because a women does not break up with their other does not mean . Their other did not abuse them at one point . 

(April 6, 2018 at 7:44 am)popeyespappy Wrote:

(April 5, 2018 at 9:18 pm)Jenny A Wrote: Because we already have insane levels on partisanship in this country.

No because whenever confronted by such a claim, I don't have a problem pointing out that the half dozen white people busted in New Hope last week for running a meth lab in the house with the rebel flag flying from the front porch probably didn't vote for Barak Obama.

Sure, they didn't. But what's in question here is whether it's cool to blanket Republicans or Democrats, as the poll does with Republicans. The answer is no.

Quote:Oh and if you idiotic argument is that he didn't refuse the contract 

1. That implies he would have taken no for an answer. And from the article the answer would have been no .

---

Quote:Whatever consenting adults do blah blah blah...unless one's a Republican adviser, then it's just sick!

There is a difference a between a sexual kink and domestic abuse fucktard . And no even if she signed the contract . Abuse is still abuse .

(April 5, 2018 at 8:48 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote:

(April 5, 2018 at 8:31 pm)popeyespappy Wrote: A good number of, perhaps even most, of the conservatives I know automatically assume all thieves, rapists and murderers and liberals so why not?

If you don't like it when "the other side" does it to yours, isn't that all the more incentive to not do it to others?

Uh, huh.  And you wonder why we keep picking on the hypocritical motherfuckers.

https://www.rawstory.com/2018/04/crusadi...efendants/

Quote:Crusading Christian DA resigns after being accused of trading light sentences for sex with defendants

Quote:A Christian prosecutor who regularly boasted of waging culture wars against liberals resigned this week amid allegations that he gave women drug dealers lighter sentences in exchange for sexual favors.

The reports that Bedford County District Attorney William Higgins stepped down from his position after he was charged by a grand jury of offering female convicts leniency if they met his sexual demands.

A republicunt, a christard and a pervert all rolled into one.  The trifecta of hypocrisy!

(April 5, 2018 at 10:38 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote:

(April 5, 2018 at 10:10 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: Sounds like she had a little fetish of her own.

Perhaps, but then again, she evidently got a hell of a lot more than she bargained for; I'm sure if there are BDSM people on this forum, they could explain that, even if she was into the prospect of an O-like lifestyle, Sparks crossed a lot of lines that shouldn't be crossed. Like it or not, in this case, the contract only has as much weight as the two people involved allow it to, because there's no way in Heaven, Hell, or Nevada that a sex slavery contract is legally binding (not since they passed the 13th Amendment).

Even if the contract is not binding . He crossed the line from BDSM to straight up abuse .

---

(April 5, 2018 at 10:54 pm)Hammy Wrote:

(April 5, 2018 at 10:42 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: They must have forgotten to discuss a safe word.  


Amateurs. 😝

Indeed.

Safe words are hot as fuck... and absolutely necessary if "no" or "stop" aren't going to be listened to.

They should be listened to

(April 5, 2018 at 8:48 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote:

(April 5, 2018 at 8:31 pm)popeyespappy Wrote: A good number of, perhaps even most, of the conservatives I know automatically assume all thieves, rapists and murderers and liberals so why not?

If you don't like it when "the other side" does it to yours, isn't that all the more incentive to not do it to others?

So you don't believe in marital rape. Tell me again, what makes you one of the "good christians"?

(April 6, 2018 at 2:58 pm)Wololo Wrote:

(April 5, 2018 at 8:48 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: If you don't like it when "the other side" does it to yours, isn't that all the more incentive to not do it to others?

So you don't believe in marital rape. Tell me again, what makes you one of the "good christians"?

I'm just the most magnificent person you will ever know, Wololie. Duh!

Can we be friends now?

(April 6, 2018 at 9:51 am)alpha male Wrote:

(April 6, 2018 at 9:28 am)Rev. Rye Wrote: I take it you didn't read the full article, since it explains the woman in question was not really in a position to consent (like railroading her into having sex with strange men while blindfolded; that's kind of difficult to reconcile with consent).

Er, the article says at that point she said no and broke up with him.

And about the abusive sex? That happened before she broke up with him; even in BDSM (well, the safe, sane, and consensual kind at least) there’s usually supposed to be a sort of ongoing agreement to what should or shouldn’t happen. Just a blanket claim of consent that covers everything isn’t enough.