(March 25, 2019 at 3:25 pm)Fake Messiah Wrote:

(March 25, 2019 at 10:11 am)Drich Wrote: No one of any serious scholarship would consider this anything other than a 14th century work Unless something older vets it.

"No scholar?" This is just pure trolling as the rest of your post which is also rambling and flaming. In any case it is not a conversation.

not what I said.

I said no one of any serious scholarship.. as I have here honorary 'doctors of theology' turn to the book of thomas more than once. Again serious scholarship is one who understand the vetting process of canonical litergy. Meaning the process the bboks of the bible went through to become the books of the holy bible.

Having one scrap or verse fragment in the 3rd century means again nothing for the very reason I stated. in that whenever the next oldest full copy is found (in this case mid 1300 when the church was rife with corruption and constantly trying to find relics and reasons to invade the middle east and kill muslims, is when your book first makes it's full appearance. Not to mention the teachings and revelations in the book of thomas are also consistent with the 14th century view of Jesus and what direction the church should go. So it is very easy to conclude that a 3rd century scrap was fund and a whole book was created around it. As there are no other original codices to confirm this book in that time. Unlike the book of Matthew or Luke which have tens if not hundreds of codacees/manuscripts dating back to the 2nd century complete books as far back as the third, in comparison to thomas' 13 century pedigree, I say again no one serious about their studies would consider the book of thomas with any regard outside of MAYBE being a gnostic mess that dark age church authors tried to recreate.

No flaming no trolling just sharing facts and how the bible was compiled and how the book of thomas falls far short which is why it was not included..

(March 26, 2019 at 8:19 am)IWNKYAAIMI Wrote:

(March 19, 2019 at 10:54 am)AtlasS33 Wrote: we have atheists to follow on the path of picturing Mary as a whore.
Did anybody assume that an angel truly came to her; and blew in her vagina?

If I had a vagina I wouldn't let a stranger blow into it. They would definitely have to take me out at least twice before they even got a glimpse of my fury love hole.
I mean, she was already with Joseph when she pulled her underpants to one side for a stranger. What a slapper.

But your asshole -and also my asshole; and the asshole of every human- is fingered by nature in a creepy, disgusting daily process we humans call "pooping/shitting"'.

Who are you fooling? your asshole gets fingered from the inside out, producing very stinky smell when that happens, this happens to you daily; but you can't believe somebody might get pregnant without a human touching them?
Maybe that smell is a message from God for you so you get off your high-horse; and remember the disgusting feeling of being helplessly tied down -by your own free will- to let nature finger you and get over with what it wants to do; just like a slave.

I think Mary's story is very believable.

Well, this took a turn, didn't it?

(March 26, 2019 at 8:51 pm)Gae Bolga Wrote: Well, this took a turn, didn't it?

Actually, I quite enjoy a good dump. I don't find it disgusting ;it is what it is.

 The phrase 'anal retentive'  just popped into my mind.  Have no idea why.


Looking at Mary's story in context of the times, it's absurd.  Yusuf would have repudiated her. 

The myth of gods procreating with humans is millennia old. Not uncommon in Greek myth. Once again, Christianity contains no new ideas. Islam even more so, as much of the Q'uran was lifted from the Torah.

My God. I've just been internally fingered.

(March 26, 2019 at 3:09 pm)AtlasS33 Wrote:

(March 26, 2019 at 8:19 am)IWNKYAAIMI Wrote: If I had a vagina I wouldn't let a stranger blow into it. They would definitely have to take me out at least twice before they even got a glimpse of my fury love hole.
I mean, she was already with Joseph when she pulled her underpants to one side for a stranger. What a slapper.

But your asshole -and also my asshole; and the asshole of every human- is fingered by nature in a creepy, disgusting daily process we humans call "pooping/shitting"'.

Who are you fooling? your asshole gets fingered from the inside out, producing very stinky smell when that happens, this happens to you daily; but you can't believe somebody might get pregnant without a human touching them?
Maybe that smell is a message from God for you so you get off your high-horse; and remember the disgusting feeling of being helplessly tied down -by your own free will- to let nature finger you and get over with what it wants to do; just like a slave.

I think Mary's story is very believable.

  this is the first marry discussion I have ever had that has ended with everyone being fingered in the butt by poop as it's final conclusion..

To me that seems like a slippery slope for homosexual experimentation. "butt to each his own..

(March 26, 2019 at 10:14 am)Drich Wrote: No flaming no trolling just sharing facts and how the bible was compiled and how the book of thomas falls far short which is why it was not included..

It is trolling because nothing you wrote is true (like 14th century dating of Thomas) and yet you call it facts so it's trolling.

(March 27, 2019 at 1:29 pm)Drich Wrote:

(March 26, 2019 at 3:09 pm)AtlasS33 Wrote: But your asshole -and also my asshole; and the asshole of every human- is fingered by nature in a creepy, disgusting daily process we humans call "pooping/shitting"'.

Who are you fooling? your asshole gets fingered from the inside out, producing very stinky smell when that happens, this happens to you daily; but you can't believe somebody might get pregnant without a human touching them?
Maybe that smell is a message from God for you so you get off your high-horse; and remember the disgusting feeling of being helplessly tied down -by your own free will- to let nature finger you and get over with what it wants to do; just like a slave.

I think Mary's story is very believable.

  this is the first marry discussion I have ever had that has ended with everyone being fingered in the butt by poop as it's final conclusion..

To me that seems like a slippery slope for homosexual experimentation. "butt to each his own..

Why? or it is more wise to say: how didn't you expect such an explanation?
Is it because you forgot that a whole civilization used to think that the "Dung Beatle" dances on feces for the sun?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dung_beetle

https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn2...l-of-dung/

Well, we humans tend to forget our roots and origins. We also love underestimating things.

Make all the jokes you want to make you feel right. But the Dung Beetle will still roll the feces, reminding you that this filth came out of you.

Imagine religious figureheads and presidents taking a poop. Imagine Trump  -for example- taking a poop in the wild; and Dung Beetles come to roll his shit. So much for the arrogant self-righteous who gave us a headache outside the toilet.

When nature calls, he'll get Dung Beetles' food coming from inside his own body with his own help. How brutal is that? imagine it on a high scale. Imagine yourself locked in a cell, and having to offer food from inside your own body to an army of beetles.

The first thing I think about when I think about this, is how a fancy Church and a fancy mosque and a fancy government building won't change the truth you so try to hide by making fun of it.

I think Atlas might be off his tits on something.

Allah.