Can someone explain this to me ? Genesis 1.

[rexbeccarox]

You said that's not possible.

Which means that logic is delusion

Oh Jesus muthereffing Christ.

[Minimalist]

The statement is pretty simple in itself. It means just what it says--that God created our universe.

It has to be Lek. It's designed to impress simpletons.

[Lek]

The statement is pretty simple in itself. It means just what it says--that God created our universe.

It has to be Lek. It's designed to impress simpletons.

I'm still waiting for rexbeccarox to answer my question Mini. Maybe you can help her out.

[rexbeccarox]

It has to be Lek. It's designed to impress simpletons.

I'm still waiting for rexbeccarox to answer my question Mini. Maybe you can help her out.

What was your question? I didn't see a question anywhere.

[Lek]

Simple. I have no idea if it even came from anywhere, let alone where.

Where did your god come from?

According to the bible he didn't "come from" anywhere. He always existed. How he always existed? We don't know. You tell me. Where did the universe come from?

Here it is. It was Post #89.

[rexbeccarox]

I did answer... in the post you quoted.

I.

Don't.

Know.

[Esquilax]

I'd still like an answer to this...

1 Theists are right. Everything can't come from nothing
2 Atheists are right. God can't come from nothing.
Since there are no other options that means that Universe can't exist. But it exists. Therefore logic is delusion.

No. Therefore you are using faulty logical premises. Why even start that "logic vs evidence" thread if you aren't going to absorb any of the information presented to you there?

Also, as a mod, I have to tell you that repeating the same post like this, and I've seen this exact wording at least three times from you now, could be construed as spam, especially when combined with your overall evasiveness and trollish behavior. I'd advise you to stop; I already almost made a report about this.

[Lek]

I did answer... in the post you quoted.

I.

Don't.

Know.

Sorry. You did answer that question. Good answer, by the way.

[Minimalist]

And much more honest than your absurd bullshit about super sky-daddies.

[Chas]

Because it doesn't say, "In the beginning, God was sitting in His temple."
It says, "In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth."
That describes a creation process, not a 'temple' of any sorts.

And if you look at the text in context and with reference to beliefs and language of the time you'll see very clearly. Clearly beyond reasonable doubt. That this is precisely not cosmology or origins being described. You're taking a simple sentence out of context and making assumptions next to your current day context. That is completely inappropriate and unhelpful. I would challenge you to back up your point with a fraction of the evidence presented. No such evidence is forthcoming from any other position that I know of.

No, you are saying the words don't mean what theyt actually say, they say whatever you want them to mean.

Typical apologist bullshit.