Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: January 22, 2025, 7:06 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Biblical Inerrancy - mandatory to be Christian?
RE: Biblical Inerrancy - mandatory to be Christian?
Mr Infidel Wrote:Then how can he be a good god, ignoring the plight of a young child who desperately needs his assistance?

The need is not desperate. The protection is not mandatory. The needs we have he gives. He gives us hope for that resurrection after death and we all will live without the plight we currently have. For those that have chosen the contract, the life during the time after resurrection, will be awesome. It does not say that to the others. In fact, at least in comparison, it will be like a pit of lava.
The Lord bless you and keep you; the Lord make his face to shine upon you and be gracious to you; the Lord lift up his countenance upon you and give you peace.
Reply
RE: Biblical Inerrancy - mandatory to be Christian?
(March 29, 2013 at 12:35 am)Tex Wrote: The need is not desperate.

How do you know that?
"Never trust a fox. Looks like a dog, behaves like a cat."
~ Erin Hunter
Reply
RE: Biblical Inerrancy - mandatory to be Christian?
(March 28, 2013 at 11:59 pm)catfish Wrote: But who are the heathens? I can look at the so-called "Gospell message" and see heathen influence in it.
Do you have a real point or do you just want to play word games?
Reply
RE: Biblical Inerrancy - mandatory to be Christian?
Mr Infidel Wrote:How do you know that?

Because not even death is desperate.
The Lord bless you and keep you; the Lord make his face to shine upon you and be gracious to you; the Lord lift up his countenance upon you and give you peace.
Reply
RE: Biblical Inerrancy - mandatory to be Christian?
(March 29, 2013 at 9:46 am)ChadWooters Wrote:
(March 28, 2013 at 11:59 pm)catfish Wrote: But who are the heathens? I can look at the so-called "Gospell message" and see heathen influence in it.
Do you have a real point or do you just want to play word games?

The point is that if you observe and worship with heathen pratices, then you just may be a heathen.
Reply
RE: Biblical Inerrancy - mandatory to be Christian?
Christians have been concerned about that stuff forever. That is no big news. Have you ever been to a church? Even the Bible itself is concerned with pagan influences, 1 Jn is written against false teachers as many other books are. Have you ever read through the Bible from start to finish and just listened to the text, ready to follow it as you recognize God?
Reply
RE: Biblical Inerrancy - mandatory to be Christian?
Of course it is. "Don't listen to that guys bullshit, listen to mine". A common trick used by cons, is to feign interest in the well-being of the mark by insinuating that there are people out there who would -gasp- take them for a ride (simultaneously reinforcing the hilarious notion that the con is not one of those people - without actually mentioning it directly- which would arouse suspicion...brilliant). Irony like this always brings a smile to my face.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
RE: Biblical Inerrancy - mandatory to be Christian?
(March 29, 2013 at 7:53 pm)jstrodel Wrote: Christians have been concerned about that stuff forever. That is no big news. Have you ever been to a church? Even the Bible itself is concerned with pagan influences, 1 Jn is written against false teachers as many other books are. Have you ever read through the Bible from start to finish and just listened to the text, ready to follow it as you recognize God?

(bolded by me)
I see your problem. Follow God and not the book...
Reply
RE: Biblical Inerrancy - mandatory to be Christian?
I can't even understand why Strodel needs that book, why referencing it would even cross his mind. He talks to god.......they're buddies.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
RE: Biblical Inerrancy - mandatory to be Christian?
(March 28, 2013 at 4:29 pm)jstrodel Wrote: So the most evil governments in history had moral legitimacy, so long as they had military power? That is nihilism.

You have just accepted the obvious fact that atheism entails nihilism.

Let's clear up the misrepresentation first. You asked "How do you know which societies laws have legitimacy and which do not?" I answered "force." You then turned that into "moral legitimacy" to try and make a point that wasn't there. I hope that this bit of dishonesty is inadvertent, but I am starting to sense a pattern.

You also asked "How do you know when you should submit to the horrible leaders of the world and when you should not?" And that, I presume, is the question that leads to the issue of moral relativism as you see it. Without an 'objective' moral guide, you presume a person will pick and choose morals subjectively and that this entails nihilism. Well, let's consider the question a bit more comprehensively:

As I said, rulers and governments legitimize their laws by force, regardless of whether that law is moral or not, good or not, ethical or not, fair or not, etc. This has, as far as we can tell, always been the case. A person may choose to submit to those laws or not, and their success may be contingent on cooperating with or overcoming that force. Some societies provide options for the laws to be amended or changed, and some have been changed when people challenged them. But even civil disobedience relied on enforcement of the law, both before and after the laws were changed. In other cases, the rulers were overthrown by force and the new rulers now legitimized their laws because now they had the force to do so.

(This next part assumes that the god of the Bible, as interpreted in the modern day, is real.)

The difference between those rulers and god is that god is supremely powerful, and no other being can challenge him. Like any other ruler, his law is legitimized by force. Unlike any other ruler, god cannot be overcome by force. This is why we hear arguments that claim that god is always good. Always ethical. Always moral. Always right. No one has the power to turn back his word, thus his word always has the ultimate force behind it. God is moral and good because he can crush you like a gnat if you believe differently.

The Pharaoh of Egypt gets a taste of this in Exodus. God sends Moses to demand the release of the Israelite slaves. When Pharaoh denies the demand, god visits plagues upon Egypt. The Biblical account tells us that there comes a point where god hardens Pharaoh's heart, so that he continues to refuse to release the Israelites. So we are to understand that Pharaoh may have been willing to release the slaves once he understood that he could not withstand god's judgment, but god forced him to accept further punishment just to make it clear who he was dealing with. In the end, when the Egyptian ruler decided to chase after the freed Israelites, god punctuates the narraive by dropping the sea on him. Have a bit of force, you little Egyptian twit.

Job got a lesson in god's morals as well. In the story of Job, the only wrong that Job does is that when professing his innocence he expresses an expectation that god will explain himself. That god will tell Job why he has treated him so unjustly. Near the end of the story, god delivers a scathing sermon to Job, the topic being "I am god, and just who do you think YOU are?" God reminds Job that he was spinning galaxies off of his fingertips before Job was a gleam in his creator's eye. Sure, he rewarded Job's loyal service to him by allowing Satan to turn his life into pure steaming hell, but that didn't mean that Job had any right to expect god to justify himself. If Job was so inclined, he was free to try and force god to apologize, but he probably couldn't even pick his disease-ravaged husk off of the ground at that point.

God, then, is the ultimate moral relativist. His morals are whatever he happens to feel that they are at any given time, and if we don't like it, too bad. We have absolutely no power to stop him, and he can end our existence with barely a thought. God is the ultimate good for the same reason. Oh, you think he's wrong for ordering the slaughter of women and children, and the rape of young girls? He thinks you're sooo cute for saying so! And by the way, here's your ticket to eternal suffering, buh-bye! Be sure to say "hi" to all of the other moral crusaders who disagreed with him when you get there! <3

I guess the only question left is: if god is the supreme moral relativist, is he also the supreme nihilist? And would that make god an atheist???

Obviously, this is all hypothetical. God's morals and goodness and ethics don't exist any more than he does. Everyone's morals are based on human considerations of what is or isn't moral. Most people base them on the morals that humanity seemed to have figured out thousands of years ago. Some people have made refinements to them as we become more and more civilized and less and less stupid.

And a final aside: It should be noted that Job may be the most shabbily-treated person in the Bible, and that's saying something. After having Satan visit all of those torments upon him, god then verbally bitch-slaps Job for the wholly understandable desire of wanting an explanation for what was done to him. At the end of this mauling, Job has two options: (A) he can tell god to take his sanctimonious BS and shove it up his holy glory hole and accept his ticket to Sheol with his new-found dignity intact or (B) he can double down on the bet that got him in this predicament in the first place. He completely pusses out by taking option B, even though it means he'll live the rest of his life knowing that there is nothing to stop god from turning his life inside out again on a whim and that his only recourse would be to bend over and pray for some lube.

But that's not all! You remember those false friends? They tormented Job, telling him that he must be a filthy little sinner because god is a just and demanding god who does not withhold punishment from wrongdoers. God threatens judgment upon them, but agrees to forgive them... if Job intercedes on their behalf. And Job, although he probably realizes that this is yet another humiliation heaped upon his diseased little head, pusses out again and does so. If there is any doubt about just how thoroughly god can crush the spirit of a man who did his best to serve him as he thought was acceptable, the story of Job should dispell them. And it was the totally moral thing to do!
"Well, evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts don't go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's in this century, but apples didn't suspend themselves in midair, pending the outcome. And humans evolved from ape- like ancestors whether they did so by Darwin's proposed mechanism or by some other yet to be discovered."

-Stephen Jay Gould
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  How can a Christian reject part of the Bible and still call themselves a Christian? KUSA 371 102363 May 3, 2020 at 1:04 am
Last Post: Paleophyte
  Rebuke on Biblical Prophecy Narishma 12 1929 May 28, 2018 at 11:46 am
Last Post: Minimalist
  Knowing god outside a biblical sense Silver 60 12726 March 31, 2018 at 1:44 am
Last Post: Godscreated
  Record few Americans believe in Biblical inerrancy. Jehanne 184 28755 December 31, 2017 at 12:37 am
Last Post: vulcanlogician
  So, what would an actual 'biblical' flood look like ?? vorlon13 64 17083 August 30, 2017 at 7:21 pm
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  Christmas Traditions and Biblical Contradictions with Reality Mystical 30 6412 December 8, 2016 at 10:01 pm
Last Post: vorlon13
  Biblical Date Rape chimp3 38 8284 July 29, 2016 at 10:35 am
Last Post: downbeatplumb
  Biblical Incest Silver 35 7899 July 19, 2016 at 11:21 am
Last Post: vorlon13
  biblical diabetes cure brewer 30 9329 June 30, 2016 at 7:34 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Pagan influences on the biblical stories of Jesus' life Panatheist 53 15358 April 11, 2016 at 10:50 pm
Last Post: Silver



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)