Evangelicals, Trump and a Quick Bible Study

[Sal]

[Pat Mustard]

The vile hateful crap is what differentiates them, unfortunately.  They can't dump it and still be christians, they'd just be people who thought you should take your neighbor a pie every once in awhile and throw a few cans of soup at the local pantry.

The bad shit in christian belief is not a bug, it's The feature.

I thought soup was for throwing at cops?

[Drich]

[Sal]

Because you're a liar @Drich.

First you said it was a response to Donald Morgan's list. It isn't. It's a response to Jim Meritt's list of contradictions. That's how I know.

I expect your lengthy rationalization and backpedaling in your next reply to this ...

[The Grand Nudger]

Oh god, he's droning on about his weekend getaway to hell, and secret pm converts..... again. Let's test the power of prayer in real time.

Still working on what my argument is? I can wait.

[DeistPaladin]

See i knew you wanted to play!

in west virginia abortion can happen after birth. why would it need to focus on life beginning at conception when you monsters are killing babies after they leave the womb? 

Normally, I look up counter-claims in a debate but I'm not going to bother and just go out on a limb and say that's bullshit. 

not for OT jews. Christians are not Ot jews. even jews today are not OT jews nor do they nor can they live by the law you are too foolish to not apply to people in a completely different religion.

Interesting. So Yahweh believes in relative morality then? That some values are right for one culture and wrong for another? Don't Christians normally accuse atheists of harboring a belief in relative morality? 

are you lying to yourself and me or too stupid to make the distinction i made fit your understanding? sanctified does not mean one man one woman intellectually dishonest paladin.. it means man and woman, numbers of man and women can vary.

You need to talk to your fellow Christians then and explain to them that they've got it all wrong. Evangelicals have been harping about "ONE man and ONE woman" as the definition of traditional, sanctified marriage. These are their words, not mine. 

in the ot it was ok to take on as many wives as yo could afford. in the nt paul limited this to one man and one woman in 1 cor 7.

More relative morality. 

sound to me like you are not prepared to deal with the reality of life in the bronze age. that you can't fathom a time where the survival of the species was in question. a time where man bearly is rising above the rest of the animal kingdom.

Once again, who's fault was that? Yahweh is the one that created this world. If "one man and one woman" was so important to him, he could have created an environment where that was possible. 

monogamy is possible if a man is married to several women

No, that's NOT monogamy by definition.

but you do not use common sense to segregate the two religions represented in the text. this gives you a false understand of both religions.

Is the OT part of the Bible or not? Did Yahweh, the same god, inspire the OT or not?

[Drich]

[DeistPaladin]

[Pat Mustard]

[The Grand Nudger]

They don't have anything else to run on, so they hope to make the election trump vs babykilling.

I can't wait to hear about all the economic anxiety this year, personally. Somehow, I don't think they've stopped being economically anxious in the past four.