Posts: 15452
Threads: 147
Joined: June 15, 2015
Reputation:
88
RE: Theists: Hitchens Wager
April 22, 2018 at 6:17 pm
(This post was last modified: April 22, 2018 at 6:18 pm by Catholic_Lady.)
(April 22, 2018 at 6:07 pm)chimp3 Wrote: (April 22, 2018 at 6:01 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: If not, then I agree with you Chimp. An atheist can have the same moral values as a theist. They just can't think those moral values (or any moral values) are correct or incorrect. That is ignorant. Sorry CL, but that is and it does not address the OP. Your claim is the worst aspect of religious thinking. That we can not be moral with out "Divine"permission . I don't buy it!
What? That's not at all what I said lol.
(April 22, 2018 at 6:14 pm)Hammy Wrote: (April 22, 2018 at 6:05 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: Khem winning best debater is bizarre. I saw he won it several years back, too. Or at least, he seems to always place in the top 3. Weird.
He's just good at strawmanning people, IMO. But I don't want this to be another rant against Khem thread... because I'm the common denominator and I don't wanna get in trouble. I've already been banned over silly shit before. I definitely went a little overboard trying to get rid of Pool (although I was trying to hurry up the inevitable, my intentions were good, but indeed they were irrelevant. Although yes, I was clearly 100% right about him and I was just facepalming over Pool's whole facade)... but then when I made a parody thread about Neo but merely didn't directly state that it was a parody thread, I even put it in the humor section but that wasn't good enough, I still got warned for trolling lol. Even though loads of people have parodied other people's threads and that wasn't seen as trolling at all /rant
Anyways, the point is that although we both agree on the matter of Khem, and henryp/wallym appears to too. I'm the common denominator because I can't stand the guy. And I don't wanna get in trouble for it (anytime I continually talk about one specific person it gets considered trolling and I get told I'm "following" them around (what does that even mean on an internet forum when I'm just more interested in responding to or talking about some people more than others? There's no malice here, just infuriation at someone who gets on my tits)).
My spats with Khem go all the way back to 2012, when I played devil's advocate for pantheism, and the entire thread was about some very basic point that he couldn't grasp. I still doubt that he could.
But yeah, please I'll be sure to be the one who gets in trouble if we keep talking about it. Just because when I'm feeling ranty I express it. I've always been like that, but the rules are changing around me.
Just block his ass. Keep calm and block on lol.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
Posts: 5664
Threads: 219
Joined: June 20, 2016
Reputation:
61
RE: Theists: Hitchens Wager
April 22, 2018 at 6:18 pm
(April 22, 2018 at 6:17 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: (April 22, 2018 at 6:07 pm)chimp3 Wrote: That is ignorant. Sorry CL, but that is and it does not address the OP. Your claim is the worst aspect of religious thinking. That we can not be moral with out "Divine"permission . I don't buy it!
What? That's not at all what I said lol. I am sorry! Please explain.
God thinks it's fun to confuse primates. Larsen's God!
Posts: 43162
Threads: 720
Joined: September 21, 2008
Reputation:
133
RE: Theists: Hitchens Wager
April 22, 2018 at 6:20 pm
(April 22, 2018 at 6:17 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: (April 22, 2018 at 6:07 pm)chimp3 Wrote: That is ignorant. Sorry CL, but that is and it does not address the OP. Your claim is the worst aspect of religious thinking. That we can not be moral with out "Divine"permission . I don't buy it!
What? That's not at all what I said lol.
(April 22, 2018 at 6:14 pm)Hammy Wrote: He's just good at strawmanning people, IMO. But I don't want this to be another rant against Khem thread... because I'm the common denominator and I don't wanna get in trouble. I've already been banned over silly shit before. I definitely went a little overboard trying to get rid of Pool (although I was trying to hurry up the inevitable, my intentions were good, but indeed they were irrelevant. Although yes, I was clearly 100% right about him and I was just facepalming over Pool's whole facade)... but then when I made a parody thread about Neo but merely didn't directly state that it was a parody thread, I even put it in the humor section but that wasn't good enough, I still got warned for trolling lol. Even though loads of people have parodied other people's threads and that wasn't seen as trolling at all /rant
Anyways, the point is that although we both agree on the matter of Khem, and henryp/wallym appears to too. I'm the common denominator because I can't stand the guy. And I don't wanna get in trouble for it (anytime I continually talk about one specific person it gets considered trolling and I get told I'm "following" them around (what does that even mean on an internet forum when I'm just more interested in responding to or talking about some people more than others? There's no malice here, just infuriation at someone who gets on my tits)).
My spats with Khem go all the way back to 2012, when I played devil's advocate for pantheism, and the entire thread was about some very basic point that he couldn't grasp. I still doubt that he could.
But yeah, please I'll be sure to be the one who gets in trouble if we keep talking about it. Just because when I'm feeling ranty I express it. I've always been like that, but the rules are changing around me.
Just block his ass. Keep calm and block on lol.
He's already blocked 
Posts: 15452
Threads: 147
Joined: June 15, 2015
Reputation:
88
RE: Theists: Hitchens Wager
April 22, 2018 at 6:22 pm
(April 22, 2018 at 6:18 pm)chimp3 Wrote: (April 22, 2018 at 6:17 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: What? That's not at all what I said lol. I am sorry! Please explain.
What I'm saying is that atheist can be moral. They just can't logically believe those morals which they hold are objective, imho.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
Posts: 43162
Threads: 720
Joined: September 21, 2008
Reputation:
133
RE: Theists: Hitchens Wager
April 22, 2018 at 6:25 pm
(April 22, 2018 at 6:22 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: (April 22, 2018 at 6:18 pm)chimp3 Wrote: I am sorry! Please explain.
What I'm saying is that atheist can be moral. They just can't logically believe those morals which they hold are objective, imho.
(I am kudosing you because you made your point clear and well, I don't agree that atheists can't believe in objective morality. I'm an atheist and believe in objective morality!)
I guess you meant to say that you don't believe that atheists can rationally believe in objective morality, right? I am sure you believe that I believe in it, but you think that I don't have rational reason to do so.
Anyways, I think you are talking on the metaethical level, but Hitchens's wager is on the normative ethics level.
Posts: 2461
Threads: 16
Joined: November 12, 2013
Reputation:
17
RE: Theists: Hitchens Wager
April 22, 2018 at 6:25 pm
(This post was last modified: April 22, 2018 at 6:25 pm by henryp.)
(April 22, 2018 at 6:02 pm)Hammy Wrote: (April 22, 2018 at 5:51 pm)henryp Wrote: I agree. You'd have to be really terrible at critical thinking to think Khemikal is a good debater, right? You've been on these forums forever. Did you not realize in all that time the majority of atheists on here were incredibly shitty critical thinkers?
No of course I noticed but that's just because most people in general are.
The atheists here are on average much better at it than the average population though. And this is still my favorite forum ever. And there are a few really smart people around here.
I was young when I got here though. My critical thinking has improved over the years. So it has become more and more obvious over time.
I'm a 'trumptard' who 'lacks intelligence', and it's pretty obvious to me Khemikal's full of shit. CL thinks God is real, and she has no trouble spotting it. Do you think me and CL are just excellent critical thinkers, and that's why we can spot it when the majority of these above average thinkers can't?
Posts: 15452
Threads: 147
Joined: June 15, 2015
Reputation:
88
RE: Theists: Hitchens Wager
April 22, 2018 at 6:28 pm
(April 22, 2018 at 6:25 pm)Hammy Wrote: (April 22, 2018 at 6:22 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: What I'm saying is that atheist can be moral. They just can't logically believe those morals which they hold are objective, imho.
(I am kudosing you because you made your point clear and well, I don't agree that atheists can't believe in objective morality. I'm an atheist and believe in objective morality!)
I guess you meant to say that you don't believe that atheists can rationally believe in objective morality, right? I am sure you believe that I believe in it, but you think that I don't have rational reason to do so.
Anyways, I think you are talking on the metaethical level, but Hitchens's wager is on the normative ethics level.
That is correct, Ham.
With that being said, I think I understand better now what the OP was asking. My answer is, no, there is no moral act/statement a theist can make that an atheist cannot. An atheist can have the same moral values as a theist.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
Posts: 5664
Threads: 219
Joined: June 20, 2016
Reputation:
61
RE: Theists: Hitchens Wager
April 22, 2018 at 6:28 pm
(April 22, 2018 at 6:22 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: (April 22, 2018 at 6:18 pm)chimp3 Wrote: I am sorry! Please explain.
What I'm saying is that atheist can be moral. They just can't logically believe those morals which they hold are objective, imho.
No! That is not what you said. You said "correct or incorrect"!
God thinks it's fun to confuse primates. Larsen's God!
Posts: 67326
Threads: 140
Joined: June 28, 2011
Reputation:
162
RE: Theists: Hitchens Wager
April 22, 2018 at 6:30 pm
(This post was last modified: April 22, 2018 at 6:34 pm by The Grand Nudger.)
I think, in context, correct and incorrect sat in as objective adjectives. Name a fact, describe that fact as correct or incorrect. The notion is that atheists....somehow, can't logically believe that their value system is objective, the right system or wrong system, the right values the wrong values.
We can, and many of us do.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Posts: 5664
Threads: 219
Joined: June 20, 2016
Reputation:
61
RE: Theists: Hitchens Wager
April 22, 2018 at 6:30 pm
(April 22, 2018 at 6:28 pm)chimp3 Wrote: (April 22, 2018 at 6:22 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: What I'm saying is that atheist can be moral. They just can't logically believe those morals which they hold are objective, imho.
No! That is not what you said. You said "correct or incorrect"!
The Bible states that if a man rapes a woman he should marry her to make things right.
God thinks it's fun to confuse primates. Larsen's God!
|
