This posturing by Neo is made all the funnier by all the stupid shit his god prescribed as deserving of death.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 22, 2024, 7:31 pm
Thread Rating:
Less anger towards religion
|
Quote:Laws to restrict abortion are based on human rights, starting with the right of a human being not to be killed by the intential acts of other human beings. Meanwhile Quote:If a man lies with a male as one lies with a woman, the two of them have done an abhorrent thing; they shall be put to death—and they retain the bloodguilt. Meanwhile https://onlysky.media/hemant-mehta/chris...ood-thing/
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse! “No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?” –SHIRLEY CHISHOLM (December 13, 2022 at 6:55 pm)Angrboda Wrote: This posturing by Neo is made all the funnier by all the stupid shit his god prescribed as deserving of death. Which is a complete non-sequiter since I have made no theological claims. The way I see it, my points stand because replies are too busy impuning my motives rather than deal with the philosophical implications of the plain facts about what abortions are and what they do. From what I understand the first 14 days from fertilization are IMHO ontologically vague enough to warrant some measure of epistemic humility and consequent political moderation on my part. So all of those of you projecting your partisanship at me can go stuff it.
<insert profound quote here>
(December 13, 2022 at 7:26 pm)Helios Wrote: MeanwhileAlso Moses: Quote:If a woman lies with a woman as one lies with a man, it's kinda hot, I won't put anything against that in the Torah.
Sooooo....somehow OT rules about homosexuality for a nomadic tribal society is relevant to abortion...how? You are such a dumbshit.
<insert profound quote here>
RE: Less anger towards religion
December 13, 2022 at 11:09 pm
(This post was last modified: December 13, 2022 at 11:30 pm by The Architect Of Fate.)
Quote:Sooooo....somehow OT rules about homosexuality for a nomadic tribal society is relevant to abortion...how? You are such a dumbshit.The fact you don't get that even your book of fairytales doesn't agree with you that people have the right not to be intentionally killed is a glowing example of your mental ineptitude. So I would give pause before calling someone else a dumbshit... You dumbshit...
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse! “No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?” –SHIRLEY CHISHOLM (December 12, 2022 at 4:38 am)Macoleco Wrote: Kind of an irrelevant thread, but just wanted to put out there that for some reason, during the last few years my hatred and anger towards the religion has considerably diminished for some reason.Is an opposition to capitalism a widespread atheist opinion? It seems I get a lot of that here. Whe. I look a around I only seem to see socialism in combination with capitalism working well. How do you see it? RE: Less anger towards religion
December 13, 2022 at 11:26 pm
(This post was last modified: December 13, 2022 at 11:28 pm by The Architect Of Fate.)
Quote:Which is a complete non-sequiter since I have made no theological claims.Yes, you did your whole case at its heart is a theological case as there as hell is no non-religious case... Quote:The way I see it, my points stand because replies are too busy impuning my motives rather than deal with the philosophical implications of the plain facts about what abortions are and what they do.Your point has been trampled into the dust and everyone dealt with your so-called "philosophical implications" so all that's left is your regressive religious irrationalism. Quote: From what I understand the first 14 days from fertilization are IMHO ontologically vague enough to warrant some measure of epistemic humility and consequent political moderation on my part.Nope, it doesn't matter if it's the first 14 days or the first 14 seconds. Life does not begin at conception and no amount of being alive gives one the right to dwell in someone else's body. This has all been dealt with already. Quote: So all of those of you projecting your partisanship at me can go stuff it.Nope it's not a projection it's a fact and you can stuff it in your pipe and smoke it Neo...
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse! “No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?” –SHIRLEY CHISHOLM (December 13, 2022 at 10:23 pm)LinuxGal Wrote:But that's also okay because they aren't fetuses...(December 13, 2022 at 7:26 pm)Helios Wrote: MeanwhileAlso Moses:
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse! “No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?” –SHIRLEY CHISHOLM (December 13, 2022 at 10:07 pm)Neo-Scholastic Wrote:(December 13, 2022 at 6:55 pm)Angrboda Wrote: This posturing by Neo is made all the funnier by all the stupid shit his god prescribed as deserving of death. Well, first off, you've made no theological claims that you've linked to your position on abortion, which is not to say the same thing as having made no theological claims. But as long as we're throwing around the non sequitur label, let's apply it aptly to the claim that your point stands because some have impugned your motives, as that does not follow at all, especially when people have made counterarguments of substance. |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)