Posts: 13392
Threads: 187
Joined: March 18, 2012
Reputation:
48
RE: Atheist Bible Study 1: Genesis
November 20, 2018 at 6:15 pm
sorry did not know you were a theist.
Thought You were declaring victory/ Jorge ran me off.
Matter of fact I would love LOVE if everyone/theists took a chapter and ran with it. I just did 16. if you need to go back and do it better then please do so!!!
Posts: 29892
Threads: 116
Joined: February 22, 2011
Reputation:
159
RE: Atheist Bible Study 1: Genesis
November 20, 2018 at 6:17 pm
(November 20, 2018 at 5:44 pm)Drich Wrote: yeah sorry noob if you were looking for a change. I will finish this book, and it will take more than an angry dragon lady to stop me.
You actually think I'm angry? Yet more proof of your inability to reason to a correct conclusion. I don't take you seriously enough to get angry, Drich.
Posts: 69247
Threads: 3759
Joined: August 2, 2009
Reputation:
259
RE: Atheist Bible Study 1: Genesis
November 20, 2018 at 6:27 pm
Let's see what Dr. Price thinks of this Genesis horseshit.
Quote:Cain is known today as the first murderer and, even more famously, for apparently pulling his wife out of thin air. Fundamentalists have never been able to answer the old stumper, “Where did Cain get his wife?” But the blinders they wear prevent them from seeing the answer, or, rather, that, as so often, they are asking the wrong question. The key thing is to realize that some editor or compiler has done his best to stitch together the disparate fragments of legends and stories available to him. These bits and pieces seem to be remnants of what must have been an extensive body of Cain material. But the J compiler has come onto the scene too late; most of the Cain lore had already been forgotten, so he had no connected narrative to pass on to us.
(p. 22)
And the key note there is that the J version was compiled from earlier folklore and mythology into one big, steaming, pile of mythology.
Posts: 6610
Threads: 73
Joined: May 31, 2014
Reputation:
56
RE: Atheist Bible Study 1: Genesis
November 20, 2018 at 6:49 pm
(This post was last modified: November 20, 2018 at 6:57 pm by GrandizerII.)
(November 20, 2018 at 6:27 pm)Minimalist Wrote: Let's see what Dr. Price thinks of this Genesis horseshit.
Quote:Cain is known today as the first murderer and, even more famously, for apparently pulling his wife out of thin air. Fundamentalists have never been able to answer the old stumper, “Where did Cain get his wife?” But the blinders they wear prevent them from seeing the answer, or, rather, that, as so often, they are asking the wrong question. The key thing is to realize that some editor or compiler has done his best to stitch together the disparate fragments of legends and stories available to him. These bits and pieces seem to be remnants of what must have been an extensive body of Cain material. But the J compiler has come onto the scene too late; most of the Cain lore had already been forgotten, so he had no connected narrative to pass on to us.
(p. 22)
And the key note there is that the J version was compiled from earlier folklore and mythology into one big, steaming, pile of mythology.
I mean, it makes a lot of sense. And it explains why, in my last reading of the story of Cain, I had this perception that there was poor flow from the story of Adam and Eve to the story of Cain, almost as if the fall (as depicted in the Adam and Eve story) never happened per the story of Cain (and almost as if Adam and Eve were all of a sudden not the only first parents of the human race).
Posts: 119
Threads: 6
Joined: January 4, 2018
Reputation:
1
RE: Atheist Bible Study 1: Genesis
November 20, 2018 at 7:13 pm
(November 20, 2018 at 6:49 pm)Grandizer Wrote: (November 20, 2018 at 6:27 pm)Minimalist Wrote: Let's see what Dr. Price thinks of this Genesis horseshit.
And the key note there is that the J version was compiled from earlier folklore and mythology into one big, steaming, pile of mythology.
I mean, it makes a lot of sense. And it explains why, in my last reading of the story of Cain, I had this perception that there was poor flow from the story of Adam and Eve to the story of Cain, almost as if the fall (as depicted in the Adam and Eve story) never happened per the story of Cain (and almost as if Adam and Eve were all of a sudden not the only first parents of the human race).
If I may ask, which of the four models used to explain the origins and composition of the Pentateuch do you find most convincing?
Or do you view it to be the result of a combination of models?
Posts: 69247
Threads: 3759
Joined: August 2, 2009
Reputation:
259
RE: Atheist Bible Study 1: Genesis
November 20, 2018 at 7:29 pm
There aren't 4 models. There are 4 sources, each written at a different time for a different purpose and audience. The resulting mass of contradictions and non sequiturs is a result of a piss-poor job of editing.
Posts: 67317
Threads: 140
Joined: June 28, 2011
Reputation:
162
RE: Atheist Bible Study 1: Genesis
November 20, 2018 at 7:34 pm
-and that;s the trouble with having these conversations with the faithful. Any academic discussion of the story for what it is, a story..is anathema to their beliefs.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Posts: 69247
Threads: 3759
Joined: August 2, 2009
Reputation:
259
RE: Atheist Bible Study 1: Genesis
November 20, 2018 at 7:46 pm
Bingo.
We have a winner.
Posts: 119
Threads: 6
Joined: January 4, 2018
Reputation:
1
RE: Atheist Bible Study 1: Genesis
November 20, 2018 at 7:46 pm
(This post was last modified: November 20, 2018 at 7:49 pm by TwoKnives99.)
(November 20, 2018 at 7:29 pm)Minimalist Wrote: There aren't 4 models. There are 4 sources, each written at a different time for a different purpose and audience. The resulting mass of contradictions and non sequiturs is a result of a piss-poor job of editing.
oh.. 4 sources, not four models, okay.
In other words I look like an idiot now
Congrats Cypher
Posts: 2278
Threads: 9
Joined: October 3, 2013
Reputation:
25
RE: Atheist Bible Study 1: Genesis
November 20, 2018 at 9:13 pm
(This post was last modified: November 20, 2018 at 9:26 pm by Bucky Ball.)
There are 4 models and 4 sources.
So everyone is right.
The Documentary Hypothesis is one of 4 models, and there are 4 sources.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Documentary_hypothesis
I think the Documentary Hypothesis (or the neo-documentary hypothesis) rings most true .. with the added proviso that priestly sources probably played a larger part than anyone imagined ... Genesis and Exodus can be seen as priests from the Southern Kingdom constantly slamming the priests and traditions from the Northern Kingdom, and vice-versa. It's not a "religious" text, (as everyone in those cultures "just assumed" that the religion of their culture was "true") ... it's a political story, entirely.
Every religion is true one way or another. It is true when understood metaphorically. But when it gets stuck in its own metaphors, interpreting them as facts, then you are in trouble. - Joseph Campbell
Militant Atheist Commie Evolutionist
|